Discussion Text National Examination: Controversy Policy

The following is the example of discussion text.
For the definition of discussion text and its explanation, just click here!

National Examination: Controversy Policy

National Examination has been administered within the education system of our country since 6 years ago. It is based on an Education Minister Decree No. 114/U/2001, but there were many problems that occurred for years, as if nothing can obscure it. These conditions, of course, have become a concern all of us, whether education ministries or non-education ministries; whether the problem is caused by the agents who involved in or the system itself. In short, national examination has raised pros and cons in the society.

From the pro point of view, National Examination has its own purpose which arranged for a good reason. National Examination is used as a standard quality of our education. If many students passed the national examination successfully, it means that our education has reached its standard, or vice versa. Besides, National Examination is also used to measure how far students’ achievement in school and how successful the curriculum is, and also to diagnose the quality of the education in primary and high schools. In short, we can say that National Examination is a legal measuring instrument specified by National Education Ministry as the determinant of students’ passing in primary and secondary schools, and it is a rightful national standard and has the same right for every student who has this certificate of National Examination.
Still, there are positive respond from students and teachers about National Examination. National Examination has encouraged and motivated them to study hard more and more, and to increase their self-independence because this examination has a national standard for all over the country, and it seems to be glorious. If they can hopefully pass this examination, it will have the students satisfied and their parents will proud of them. As same as the students, the teachers will try to do their best by sacrificing their time and energy for the success of their students.
In contrast, if we refer to our curriculum that lawfully used in our education system, KTSP (School-Based Curriculum), it seems irrelevant. Based on School-Based Curriculum, teacher measures three aspect of learning: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. So the students’ achievement is identified and measured by the teacher because only the teacher who know much more about students’ daily abilities and attitudes in school, not the National Examination.
But the most common complaint about National Examination is that the success in junior and even high school is identified only by three days-National Examination. So, what means by studying three years? Some teachers also said that National Examination may knock down their self-regard, they have done all things within three years, but the peak or the evaluation only determine by three days examination.
From the explanation above, we know that ‘no one thing good for all’. In this context, it means that National Examination policy faces pros and cons. It is the consequence of this policy. On the other hand, when a problem appears, the solution should be found by all of education components, especially National Education Department (Depdiknas) or the supervisor of Indonesia Education System. Finally, apart from pros and cons, the presence of National Examination is expected would increase the quality of Indonesia Educational System.

The Other Discussion Texts Examples:

  1. Fossil Fuels Pros and Cons
  2. What are Some Good and Bad Things about Becoming a Vegetarian?
  3. The Good and Bad Effects of TV for Children
  4. Caffeine – Good or Bad?
  5. The Pros & Cons of Credit Cards
  6. National Examination: Controversy Policy
  7. Pro’s and Con’s of Nuclear Power
  8. Should Abortion be Legal?
  9. Should Marijuana be a Medical Option?
  10. Are Social Networking Sites Good for Our Society?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Past Continuous Tense

Past Continuous Tense The Past Continuous tense , also known as past progressive tense, indicates a continuing action, something that was happening, going on, at certain point in the past. The action can be interrupted by another action or can happen at the same time. This tense is generally occurs only with dynamic verb, not the static one. The Patterns The Past Continuous tense is formed with the helping verb of the past be (was, were) and the present participle (verb with an – ing ending). See the following patterns carefully! Affirmative Subject + past be (was, were) + V-ing (the present participle) Negative Subject + past be (was, were) +not + V-ing (the present participle) Interrogative past be (was, were) + Subject + V-ing (the present participle) The proper conjugation of the past be with the subject pronoun Was —————–>> I, He, She, It or the singular or the uncountable noun Were —————>> You, We, They or the plural noun Time Signals ...
Read more

Present Continuous Tense

Present Continuous Tense  The continuous and progressive aspects (abbreviated CONT and PROG) are grammatical aspects that express incomplete action in progress at a specific time: they are non-habitual, imperfective aspects. It is a verb category with two principal meaning components: (limited) duration and (possible) incompletion. Most languages treat continuous and progressive aspects as alike and use the two terms interchangeably, but there are languages that distinguish them. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Present_continuous) The Present Continuous which is also known as present progressive is used to tell actions going on at the moment of speaking and for actions taking place only for a short period of time. It is also used to express development and actions arranged for the near future. The present progressive emphasizes on the course or the duration of an action. The Patterns Affirmative Subject+be (am,is,are)+ Verb-ing (present participle) ——>> I am doin...
Read more

Past Perfect Tense

Past Perfect Tense  The Past Perfect Tense is used when we are relating two events which happen in the past, one action occurres before another or an action finishes before another action. The Past Perfect Tense helps to show which event happens first. This tense is also used in reported speech, third conditional sentences, or to show the past dissatisfaction. The Patterns Affirmative Subject+had+V3 (past participle) ——>> I had done …. Negative Subject+had+not +V3 (past participle) ——>> I had not done …. Interrogative Had + Subject +V3 (past participle) —–>> Had you done …?   Time Signal The time signals usually used with the past perfect tense among others are already, just, never, not yet, once, until that day, by, by the time, when…., etc. Note: 1. Just Just is used with the Past Perfect to refer to an event that happens only a short time earlier than now. Examples: She had just finished cooking when I arrived home. The crimi...
Read more